| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Fewer vs. less ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Fewer vs. less
According to prescriptive grammar, "fewer" should be used (instead of "less") with nouns for countable objects and concepts (discretely quantifiable nouns or count nouns). According to this rule, "less" should be used only with a grammatically singular noun (including mass nouns) and only when they suggest "a combination into a unit, a group, or an aggregation: ''less than $50'' (a sum of money); ''less than three miles'' (a unit of distance)".〔(【引用サイトリンク】title=Fewer/Less Usage Note on Dictionary.com )〕 However, descriptive grammarians (who describe language as actually used) point out that this rule does not correctly describe the most common usage of today or the past and in fact arose as an incorrect generalization of a personal preference expressed by a grammarian in 1770.〔
This rule can be seen in the examples "there is less flour in this canister" and "there are fewer cups (grains, pounds, bags, etc.) of flour in this canister", which are based on the reasoning that flour is uncountable whereas the unit used to measure the flour (cup etc.) is countable. Nevertheless, even most prescriptivists accept the most common usage "there are less cups of flour in this canister" and prescribe the rule addition that "less" should be used with units of measurement (other examples: "less than 10 pounds/dollars"). Prescriptivists would however consider only "fewer cups of coffee" to be correct in a sentence such as "there are fewer cups of coffee on the table now", where the cups are countable separate objects, although most people now and in the past use "less" even in such cases. In addition, "less" is recommended in front of counting nouns that denote distance, amount, or time. For example, "we go on holiday in fewer than four weeks" and "he can run the 100 m in fewer than ten seconds" are not advised. 〔http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/definitions/fewer-v-less/ Fewer vs less 〕
Some prescriptivists argue that even the extremely rare and completely unidiomatic〔(One fewer non-rule to follow )〕 "one fewer" should be used instead of "one less" (both when used alone or together with a singular, discretely quantifiable noun as in "there is one less cup on this table"), but Merriam–Webster's Dictionary of English Usage clearly states that common usage dictates "one less" in all cases.〔
==Current usage==
The comparative ''less'' is used with both count and uncount nouns in some informal discourse environments and in most dialects of English. In other informal discourse however, the use of ''fewer'' could be considered natural. Many supermarket checkout line signs, for instance, will read "10 items or less"; others, however, will use ''fewer'' in an attempt to conform to what is incorrectly perceived as required by the prescription although this is in fact a clear case of hypercorrection as explained in Pocket Fowler’s Modern English Usage.〔''Supermarket checkouts are correct when the signs they display read 5 items or less (which refers to a total amount), and are misguidedly pedantic when they read 5 items or fewer (which emphasizes individuality, surely not the intention).'' ()〕〔 A British supermarket chain replaced its "10 items or less" notices at checkouts with "up to 10 items" to avoid the issue. It has also been noted that it is less common to favour "At fewest ten items" over "At least ten items" – a potential inconsistency in the "rule",〔(Tesco is to change the wording of signs on its fast-track checkouts to avoid any linguistic dispute ), BBC, August 2008.〕 and a study of online usage seems to suggest that the distinction may, in fact, be semantic rather than grammatical.〔.〕 Likewise, it would be very unusual to hear the unidiomatic "I have seen that film at fewest ten times." 〔http://www.englishgrammar.org/fewest/#909Ouw2BGuUkpWTU.99 Less vs fewer 〕
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Fewer vs. less」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|